If you have an idea for a blog post or a new forum thread, then please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org, with a summary of the topic and its source (e.g., an academic paper, conference talk, external blog post or news item).
Conjuring a Neutron Star from a Nanowire
Using tiny mechanical devices to create accelerations equivalent to 100 million times the Earth’s gravitational field—mimicking the arena of quantum gravity in the lab.
FQXi Administrator Zeeya Merali wrote on Jan. 14, 2014 @ 21:18 GMT
Depending on how familiar you are with FQXi, you may know that we like to cause a little mischief at our conferences. Knowing that we had famed string theoristRaphael Bousso and Carlo Rovelli, one of the originators of loop quantum gravity, in the same room, we couldn't resist asking them to debate these rivals routes to a theory of quantum gravity.
Both men are passionate about their work and fierce defenders of their own theories. So, of course, we turned the debate upside down and asked them argue the *reverse* position.
So here's LQG proponent Carlo Rovelli explaining why anyone with any sense would be a string theorist, while string theorist Raphael Bousso staunchly defends LQG as the superior theory:
And if you liked that, here are some of our classic mock debates from our previous meeting.
Julian Barbour and Tim Maudlin reverse debate the reality of time:
And David Albert and David Wallace switch positions on the Many World's Interpretation of quantum mechanics:
this post has been edited by the forum administrator