Search FQXi


If you have an idea for a blog post or a new forum thread, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org, with a summary of the topic and its source (e.g., an academic paper, conference talk, external blog post or news item).
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Zeeya Merali: on 1/14/14 at 21:18pm UTC, wrote Depending on how familiar you are with FQXi, you may know that we like to...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Georgina Parry: "A significant difference with this explanatory framework. The space-time..." in Ripping Apart Einstein

Vladimir Rogozhin: "Hello Eckard, I looked at your link. I believe that the blame for the one..." in How Should Humanity Steer...

Georgina Parry: "John, it doesn't necessitate the scrapping of SR but within the..." in Ripping Apart Einstein

Akinbo Ojo: "Peter J, Thank you for your frankness in answering the questions. With..." in Why Quantum?

Pentcho Valev: "Is Physics in Danger ? Albert Einstein Institute: "Here is an animation of..." in Faster than Light

Jonathan Dickau: "Yes Steve, String theory has not lived up to its promise, and where it has..." in Why Quantum?

Vladimir Rogozhin: "John, "Hope dies last." Hope as transcendental. Violence, lies,..." in How Should Humanity Steer...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Heart of Darkness
An intrepid physicist attempts to climb into the core of black hole.

Why Quantum?
Entropy could explain why nature chose to play by quantum rules.

Reality's NeverEnding Story
A quantum version of Darwinian natural selection could enable the universe to write itself into being.

The Quantum Dictionary
Mark Van Raamsdonk is re-writing how we define the shape of our universe. Can such translations help to unite quantum theory and gravity?

Q&A with Paul Davies: What is Time?
Where does time come from? Why does it seem to flow?


FQXi BLOGS
July 25, 2014

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: String theory vs Loop Quantum Gravity: Bousso and Rovelli FIGHT (backwards) [refresh]
Bookmark and Share

FQXi Administrator Zeeya Merali wrote on Jan. 14, 2014 @ 21:18 GMT
Depending on how familiar you are with FQXi, you may know that we like to cause a little mischief at our conferences. Knowing that we had famed string theorist Raphael Bousso and Carlo Rovelli, one of the originators of loop quantum gravity, in the same room, we couldn't resist asking them to debate these rivals routes to a theory of quantum gravity.

Both men are passionate about their work and fierce defenders of their own theories. So, of course, we turned the debate upside down and asked them argue the *reverse* position.

So here's LQG proponent Carlo Rovelli explaining why anyone with any sense would be a string theorist, while string theorist Raphael Bousso staunchly defends LQG as the superior theory:



And if you liked that, here are some of our classic mock debates from our previous meeting.

Julian Barbour and Tim Maudlin reverse debate the reality of time:



And David Albert and David Wallace switch positions on the Many World's Interpretation of quantum mechanics:



this post has been edited by the forum administrator

report post as inappropriate



Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.