Search FQXi


If you have an idea for a blog post or a new forum thread, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org, with a summary of the topic and its source (e.g., an academic paper, conference talk, external blog post or news item).
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Zeeya Merali: on 1/14/14 at 21:18pm UTC, wrote Depending on how familiar you are with FQXi, you may know that we like to...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Thomas Ray: ""Different preferred methodologies will indeed give different answers." ..." in The Quantum Pet Store:...

Peter Jackson: "Steve, I use what's actually found, you rely on old guesses. Different..." in The Quantum Pet Store:...

John Merryman: "Thanks Jonathan. I get a moment later in the day.. Regards, John M" in Black Holes Do Not Exist,...

John Merryman: "Tom, The problem with the premise of monotheism is that absolute is..." in Black Holes Do Not Exist,...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Life's Quantum Crystal Ball
Does the ability to predict the future—perhaps with quantum help—define the fundamental difference between living and inanimate matter?

The Quantum Truth Seeker
Watching particles fly through an interferometer might help to unveil higher-order weirdness behind quantum theory.

Quantifying Occam
Is the simplest answer always the best? Connecting Medieval monks to computational complexity, using the branch of mathematics known as category theory.

Heart of Darkness
An intrepid physicist attempts to climb into the core of black hole.

Why Quantum?
Entropy could explain why nature chose to play by quantum rules.


FQXi BLOGS
October 24, 2014

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: String theory vs Loop Quantum Gravity: Bousso and Rovelli FIGHT (backwards) [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

FQXi Administrator Zeeya Merali wrote on Jan. 14, 2014 @ 21:18 GMT
Depending on how familiar you are with FQXi, you may know that we like to cause a little mischief at our conferences. Knowing that we had famed string theorist Raphael Bousso and Carlo Rovelli, one of the originators of loop quantum gravity, in the same room, we couldn't resist asking them to debate these rivals routes to a theory of quantum gravity.

Both men are passionate about their work and fierce defenders of their own theories. So, of course, we turned the debate upside down and asked them argue the *reverse* position.

So here's LQG proponent Carlo Rovelli explaining why anyone with any sense would be a string theorist, while string theorist Raphael Bousso staunchly defends LQG as the superior theory:



And if you liked that, here are some of our classic mock debates from our previous meeting.

Julian Barbour and Tim Maudlin reverse debate the reality of time:



And David Albert and David Wallace switch positions on the Many World's Interpretation of quantum mechanics:



this post has been edited by the forum administrator

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.