Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Plato Hagel: on 1/17/14 at 19:48pm UTC, wrote Wouldn't information lie at the heart of what energy/matter begins as it...

John Merryman: on 1/17/14 at 0:40am UTC, wrote Knowledge is information. Wisdom is in the editing.

Robert McEachern: on 1/16/14 at 23:13pm UTC, wrote Eckard, Actually, about 99.99999999999% of the information content of...

Eckard Blumschein: on 1/16/14 at 18:38pm UTC, wrote Don't forget, we have to forget at least 99,999% of the information on...

Akinbo Ojo: on 1/16/14 at 9:10am UTC, wrote I was taken aback by the essay contest title as well. We are not...

Pentcho Valev: on 1/16/14 at 8:46am UTC, wrote "What? No fuss about the next essay contest??? How Should Humanity Steer...

John Merryman: on 1/16/14 at 1:22am UTC, wrote What? No fuss about the next essay contest??? How Should Humanity Steer the...

Lorraine Ford: on 1/9/14 at 14:26pm UTC, wrote Re Alex Vilenkin "Indexical information is information an observer has...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

James Putnam: ""My decisive argument is: One need not referring to absolute values of x as..." in The Disintegration of the...

Steve Dufourny: "we could even correlate with the Mtheory and the main primordial field in..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Steve Dufourny: "and if teleology entropy,gravitation, dark matter,all this puzzle could be..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Eckard Blumschein: "Speed does indeed not "not inform us of position or time of position". In..." in The Disintegration of the...

Eric ------: "It seems that Max Tegmark is equating mathematics with patterns of..." in Tegmark's Mathematical...

kurt stocklmeir: "Around 1990 I said time particles and space particles are spin 1 tachyons. ..." in Alternative Models of...

Steve Dufourny: "We can unify G h and c,we can also make convergences between the..." in Alternative Models of...

Steve Dufourny: "QUANTUM COMPUTE............... Sphères of Bloch ....spherical..." in Alternative Models of...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Riding the Rogue Quantum Waves
Could giant sea swells help explain how the macroscopic world emerges from the quantum microworld? (Image credit: MIT News)

Rescuing Reality
A "retrocausal" rewrite of physics, in which influences from the future can affect the past, could solve some quantum quandaries—saving Einstein's view of reality along the way.

Untangling Quantum Causation
Figuring out if A causes B should help to write the rulebook for quantum physics.

In Search of a Quantum Spacetime
Finding the universe's wavefunction could be the key to understanding the emergence of reality.

Collapsing Physics: Q&A with Catalina Oana Curceanu
Tests of a rival to quantum theory, taking place in the belly of the Gran Sasso d'Italia mountain, could reveal how the fuzzy subatomic realm of possibilities comes into sharp macroscopic focus.


FQXi BLOGS
December 8, 2016

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Defining Information [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

FQXi Administrator Zeeya Merali wrote on Jan. 8, 2014 @ 18:10 GMT
Ok, so I'm a little out of synch in terms of blogging, and technically this should have been the first post about FQXi's Physics of Information meeting, but hey, causality's indefinite at the fundamental level, right?

Anyway, the first panel discussion on Monday addressed "Perspectives on Information in its many forms" and Max Tegmark asked participants to each give a one sentence definition of what information *is*. Enjoy:

Alex Vilenkin: Indexical information is information an observer has about himself.

Carlo Rovelli: The notion of information useful in physics is Shannon Relative Information between two systems.

Fred Adams: Information is a MEASURE of the CONTENT of a signal or structure.

Giulio Tononi: Integrated Information is how a system or mechanism constrains its past and its future.

Jos Uffink: Fisher Information measures how easily distinguishable different probability distributions are by statistical inference.

Kevin Knuth: “Information is that which constrains our beliefs.” – Ariel Caticha

Luis Garay: Horizon Entropy counts microstates of the black hole.

Marcelo Gleiser: Knowledge is meaningful information.

Matt Pusey: The information of X is the length (in bits) of the shortest program to generate X.

Olimpia Lombardi: The concept of information deserves a pluralist interpretation.

Steve Giddings: Quantum information is a characteristic of quantum-mechanical systems or subsystems - corresponding to the different possible states that they may realize - that is conserved for a closed system under quantum-mechanical evolution and can be transferred between subsystems of a larger quantum system.

Wayne Myrvold: Information is the change of belief state that occurs when an agent learns something new.

this post has been edited by the forum administrator

report post as inappropriate


Lorraine Ford wrote on Jan. 9, 2014 @ 14:26 GMT
Re Alex Vilenkin "Indexical information is information an observer has about himself.":

So how would you label information an observer has about the rest of reality? If you add the 2 types of partial information together do you get a whole? Isn't an observer, in essence, a subject?

Re Kevin Knuth "Information is that which constrains our beliefs. - Ariel Caticha":

Presumably our beliefs are themselves formed by "information", which may be "true" or "false" - we can't always tell.

Re Marcelo Gleiser "Knowledge is meaningful information.":

Surely information is subjective experience? The numbers letters and squiggles on the pages of an unread textbook or computer screen REPRESENT information, but actual meaningful information requires subjective experience i.e. it requires a subject to be able to read and understand the squiggles.

Re Wayne Myrvold "Information is the change of belief state that occurs when an agent learns something new.":

That "something new" might be true or false, you can't always tell. If a particle could be considered to be an agent, presumably this would be the simplest possible case of the apprehension of information ; but if the agent were complex (i.e. a living thing composed of particles) the apprehension of information would be more complex, allowing "true" and "false" information?

report post as inappropriate


John Brodix Merryman wrote on Jan. 16, 2014 @ 01:22 GMT
What? No fuss about the next essay contest??? How Should Humanity Steer the Future?

report post as inappropriate

Pentcho Valev replied on Jan. 16, 2014 @ 08:46 GMT
"What? No fuss about the next essay contest??? How Should Humanity Steer the Future?"

Physics is dead and FQXi are going to replace it with information, free will, ethics, magic, black magic perhaps, humanitarianism, futurism. The process is irreversible - why should there be any fuss?

Pentcho Valev

report post as inappropriate

Akinbo Ojo replied on Jan. 16, 2014 @ 09:10 GMT
I was taken aback by the essay contest title as well. We are not politicians or sociologists. I was similarly taken aback by the title of the 2013 contest though I confess not as much as this time, however some essays relevant to physics still managed to come forth. I think with some imagination one should give it a try. But I think for the 2015 the community should have a say or suggestions on the essay topic. I think Armin Shirazi and someone else made some more relevant suggestions on topics.

Akinbo

report post as inappropriate


Eckard Blumschein wrote on Jan. 16, 2014 @ 18:38 GMT
Don't forget, we have to forget at least 99,999% of the information on structures we receive via eyes and ears during our lifetime. Too much information is a burden.

report post as inappropriate

Robert H McEachern replied on Jan. 16, 2014 @ 23:13 GMT
Eckard,

Actually, about 99.99999999999% of the information content of light is lost, before it ever reaches the optic nerve. An input bandwidth of 2.5x1014 Hz is reduced down to just 10 Hz!

Rob McEachern

report post as inappropriate

John Brodix Merryman replied on Jan. 17, 2014 @ 00:40 GMT
Knowledge is information. Wisdom is in the editing.

report post as inappropriate


Plato Hagel wrote on Jan. 17, 2014 @ 19:48 GMT
Wouldn't information lie at the heart of what energy/matter begins as it forms as an emergent property of what we as consciousness use? In this way it begins as a asymmetrical expression from a state of symmetry?

One might say that energy valuation is determinant of an aspect and use of that consciousness? An energy level?

this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:

And select the letter between 'C' and 'E':


Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.