Search FQXi


If you have an idea for a blog post or a new forum thread, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org, with a summary of the topic and its source (e.g., an academic paper, conference talk, external blog post or news item).
Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Plato Hagel: on 1/17/14 at 19:48pm UTC, wrote Wouldn't information lie at the heart of what energy/matter begins as it...

John Merryman: on 1/17/14 at 0:40am UTC, wrote Knowledge is information. Wisdom is in the editing.

Robert McEachern: on 1/16/14 at 23:13pm UTC, wrote Eckard, Actually, about 99.99999999999% of the information content of...

Eckard Blumschein: on 1/16/14 at 18:38pm UTC, wrote Don't forget, we have to forget at least 99,999% of the information on...

Akinbo Ojo: on 1/16/14 at 9:10am UTC, wrote I was taken aback by the essay contest title as well. We are not...

Pentcho Valev: on 1/16/14 at 8:46am UTC, wrote "What? No fuss about the next essay contest??? How Should Humanity Steer...

John Merryman: on 1/16/14 at 1:22am UTC, wrote What? No fuss about the next essay contest??? How Should Humanity Steer the...

Lorraine Ford: on 1/9/14 at 14:26pm UTC, wrote Re Alex Vilenkin "Indexical information is information an observer has...


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Pentcho Valev: "Einstein's False Postulate That Killed Physics (3) Clever Einsteinians..." in New Podcast: A MICROSCOPE...

Joe Fisher: "Georgina, You are confusing invisible with out-of-sight. The real..." in Collapsing Physics: Q&A...

Lorraine Ford: "Georgina, I’m sorry about my offensive remark 2 posts ago: my comment..." in Physics of the Observer -...

Georgina Woodward: "Lorraine, Don, further to my previous post; I think the analogy I used..." in Physics of the Observer -...

Steve Dufourny: "Hi Georgina, I am understanding,we imporve after all our models and..." in New Podcast: A MICROSCOPE...

Georgina Woodward: "Hi Joe, you have previously said that the light does not travel. How is..." in Collapsing Physics: Q&A...

Pentcho Valev: "Why LIGO Cannot Fake Neutron Star Gravitational Waves LIGO conspirators..." in LIGO to Make a...

Steve Agnew: "For most macroscopic actions, the notions of continuous space and time work..." in Real-Time Physics


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Collapsing Physics: Q&A with Catalina Oana Curceanu
Tests of a rival to quantum theory, taking place in the belly of the Gran Sasso d'Italia mountain, could reveal how the fuzzy subatomic realm of possibilities comes into sharp macroscopic focus.

Dropping Schrödinger's Cat Into a Black Hole
Combining gravity with the process that transforms the fuzzy uncertainty of the quantum realm into the definite classical world we see around us could lead to a theory of quantum gravity.

Does Quantum Weirdness Arise When Parallel Classical Worlds Repel?
Quantum mechanics could derive from subtle interactions among unseen neighboring universes

Wrinkles in Spacetime
Searching for defects in the fabric of the cosmos could help physicists home in on the correct theory of quantum gravity.

Blurring Causal Lines
Quantum experiments mix past and future on the microscopic scale—opening the door to faster computers and revising our notion of causality.


FQXi BLOGS
May 31, 2016

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Defining Information [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

FQXi Administrator Zeeya Merali wrote on Jan. 8, 2014 @ 18:10 GMT
Ok, so I'm a little out of synch in terms of blogging, and technically this should have been the first post about FQXi's Physics of Information meeting, but hey, causality's indefinite at the fundamental level, right?

Anyway, the first panel discussion on Monday addressed "Perspectives on Information in its many forms" and Max Tegmark asked participants to each give a one sentence definition of what information *is*. Enjoy:

Alex Vilenkin: Indexical information is information an observer has about himself.

Carlo Rovelli: The notion of information useful in physics is Shannon Relative Information between two systems.

Fred Adams: Information is a MEASURE of the CONTENT of a signal or structure.

Giulio Tononi: Integrated Information is how a system or mechanism constrains its past and its future.

Jos Uffink: Fisher Information measures how easily distinguishable different probability distributions are by statistical inference.

Kevin Knuth: “Information is that which constrains our beliefs.” – Ariel Caticha

Luis Garay: Horizon Entropy counts microstates of the black hole.

Marcelo Gleiser: Knowledge is meaningful information.

Matt Pusey: The information of X is the length (in bits) of the shortest program to generate X.

Olimpia Lombardi: The concept of information deserves a pluralist interpretation.

Steve Giddings: Quantum information is a characteristic of quantum-mechanical systems or subsystems - corresponding to the different possible states that they may realize - that is conserved for a closed system under quantum-mechanical evolution and can be transferred between subsystems of a larger quantum system.

Wayne Myrvold: Information is the change of belief state that occurs when an agent learns something new.

this post has been edited by the forum administrator

report post as inappropriate


Lorraine Ford wrote on Jan. 9, 2014 @ 14:26 GMT
Re Alex Vilenkin "Indexical information is information an observer has about himself.":

So how would you label information an observer has about the rest of reality? If you add the 2 types of partial information together do you get a whole? Isn't an observer, in essence, a subject?

Re Kevin Knuth "Information is that which constrains our beliefs. - Ariel Caticha":

Presumably our beliefs are themselves formed by "information", which may be "true" or "false" - we can't always tell.

Re Marcelo Gleiser "Knowledge is meaningful information.":

Surely information is subjective experience? The numbers letters and squiggles on the pages of an unread textbook or computer screen REPRESENT information, but actual meaningful information requires subjective experience i.e. it requires a subject to be able to read and understand the squiggles.

Re Wayne Myrvold "Information is the change of belief state that occurs when an agent learns something new.":

That "something new" might be true or false, you can't always tell. If a particle could be considered to be an agent, presumably this would be the simplest possible case of the apprehension of information ; but if the agent were complex (i.e. a living thing composed of particles) the apprehension of information would be more complex, allowing "true" and "false" information?

report post as inappropriate


John Brodix Merryman wrote on Jan. 16, 2014 @ 01:22 GMT
What? No fuss about the next essay contest??? How Should Humanity Steer the Future?

report post as inappropriate

Pentcho Valev replied on Jan. 16, 2014 @ 08:46 GMT
"What? No fuss about the next essay contest??? How Should Humanity Steer the Future?"

Physics is dead and FQXi are going to replace it with information, free will, ethics, magic, black magic perhaps, humanitarianism, futurism. The process is irreversible - why should there be any fuss?

Pentcho Valev

report post as inappropriate

Akinbo Ojo replied on Jan. 16, 2014 @ 09:10 GMT
I was taken aback by the essay contest title as well. We are not politicians or sociologists. I was similarly taken aback by the title of the 2013 contest though I confess not as much as this time, however some essays relevant to physics still managed to come forth. I think with some imagination one should give it a try. But I think for the 2015 the community should have a say or suggestions on the essay topic. I think Armin Shirazi and someone else made some more relevant suggestions on topics.

Akinbo

report post as inappropriate


Eckard Blumschein wrote on Jan. 16, 2014 @ 18:38 GMT
Don't forget, we have to forget at least 99,999% of the information on structures we receive via eyes and ears during our lifetime. Too much information is a burden.

report post as inappropriate

Robert H McEachern replied on Jan. 16, 2014 @ 23:13 GMT
Eckard,

Actually, about 99.99999999999% of the information content of light is lost, before it ever reaches the optic nerve. An input bandwidth of 2.5x1014 Hz is reduced down to just 10 Hz!

Rob McEachern

report post as inappropriate

John Brodix Merryman replied on Jan. 17, 2014 @ 00:40 GMT
Knowledge is information. Wisdom is in the editing.

report post as inappropriate


Plato Hagel wrote on Jan. 17, 2014 @ 19:48 GMT
Wouldn't information lie at the heart of what energy/matter begins as it forms as an emergent property of what we as consciousness use? In this way it begins as a asymmetrical expression from a state of symmetry?

One might say that energy valuation is determinant of an aspect and use of that consciousness? An energy level?

this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:

And select the letter between 'A' and 'C':


Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.