Search FQXi

If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help

Zeeya: on 2/5/13 at 14:15pm UTC, wrote Thanks for the link to your tribute to Ray Bradbury, William. I have to...

Brendan Foster: on 2/4/13 at 22:10pm UTC, wrote Thanks for the piece William. I wonder if this post got a little lost with...

Thomas Ray: on 1/8/13 at 11:14am UTC, wrote Hi William, What a beautiful piece. "It's all imagination?" Who's to...

William Orem: on 1/6/13 at 1:25am UTC, wrote Here's a vacation photo from this past summer. It's taken on Mars; I went...


Steven Andresen: "James I am wondering if you will respond to my concept for inertial mass?..." in Alternative Models of...

Steven Andresen: "Jose You said "Did what I wrote appear as if I am referring to a previous..." in Alternative Models of...

Gary Simpson: "Ted, BTW, it is the community vote that matters ... not the public vote...." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Gary Simpson: "Ted, You statement regarding your score does not make any sense. You..." in FQXi Essay Contest 2016:...

Algernon kk: "Steve Agnew is a legend for doing that. A lot of people at custom..." in Weinberg: Why quantum...

Steve Dufourny: ":) it is fqxi which merits these thanks, me I just share this information. ..." in 2016: The Physics Year in...

Bishal Banjara: "thank you once again .....thank you!!" in 2016: The Physics Year in...

Roger Granet: "Hi. Interesting article! This actually makes sense to me and sounds..." in Quantum Replicants:...

click titles to read articles

Quantum Replicants: Should future androids dream of quantum sheep?
To build the ultimate artificial mimics of real life systems, we may need to use quantum memory.

Painting a QBist Picture of Reality
A radical interpretation of physics makes quantum theory more personal.

The Spacetime Revolutionary
Carlo Rovelli describes how black holes may transition to "white holes," according to loop quantum gravity, a radical rewrite of fundamental physics.

Riding the Rogue Quantum Waves
Could giant sea swells help explain how the macroscopic world emerges from the quantum microworld? (Image credit: MIT News)

Rescuing Reality
A "retrocausal" rewrite of physics, in which influences from the future can affect the past, could solve some quantum quandaries—saving Einstein's view of reality along the way.

February 27, 2017

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: Another World [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Blogger William Orem wrote on Jan. 6, 2013 @ 01:25 GMT

Here's a vacation photo from this past summer. It's taken on Mars; I went there, along with thousands of fascinated others, on the vehicle of the Curiosity rover and the vehicle of my imagination. I, for one, have yet to come home.

NASA's Mars Science Laboratory has been a clear success, especially give the its knotty landing protocol and the distressing history of Mars-mission botches. We humans are once again driving around on an alien planet, this time with much more advanced equipment for soil analysis, climate studies, and geological work. When chief scientist John Grotzinger made his now-notorious slip, claiming "one for the history books" had been discovered on the angry red planet, the blogs went a-buzz with speculation. I myself didn't expect microbial fossils, but nor did I rule them out. (Actually, I expected confirmed indigenous organics.) It really doesn't matter, though; there's a broader way in which it's all for this history books at this point. Think what it means that humanity has reached a place where we can be disappointed by a not-so-spectacular finding . . . on a different planet.

Take a look again at this image. I find it quite possible to put myself there, on that rocky hill, without much of an imaginative leap. These may be the first views of regions our descendants will one day inhabit, the equivalent of frontier land. Alternatively, if the microbes that started the evolutionary tree currently branching out all over Earth came originally from Mars, then we are once again looking at home--not in a relatively near future, but from our unimaginably remote past. Very little of what we discover on our celestial neighbor can really be trivial.

NASA named the subsection of the Gale crater where MSL touched down "Bradbury Landing Site," in honor of the writer who died just a few months before contact. It was an appreciation in which many shared. Last summer I myself wrote a tribute piece to Ray Bradbury that ran on the Psychology Today website, talking about his influence on my own youth. Bradbury was a master at humanizing the idea of travel to Mars--the science was all wrong (not that he cared), but the psychology was very right. But it isn't Bradbury, actually, nor Edgar Rice Burroughs, nor H. G. Wells I think of most when musing on these images. It's Carl Sagan, and the observation he makes in *Pale Blue Dot*, that--after the various planetary probes, after the Mariners and Pioneers and Voyagers--the other planets in our Solar System have now become not mythical gods, not wandering lights in the sky, but actual *places*. You can't go to Mars or to Mercury just yet, but you can conceive of doing so, in the same way you can conceive of going to the North Pole. Thanks to science, the night sky has started to become graspable to the imagination.

That's my experience of what the MSL has already brought us, regardless of what may yet be uncovered. Relaxing here quietly, taking a moment aside from my day, I can sit cross-legged in that chilly Martian sand. I can feel it, gritty against my thighs. I can squint against the incessant blowing dust, and hear the wind storms moaning across those distant mountains.

More: I can leave Curiosity behind, and walk over that hill of rocks, just there, so close to the hand. I can pick them up, feel the rusty weight, somewhat less than they would have on my home world. I can dig my thumbnail into their jagged surfaces. I can swing my legs over the edge of that cliff and watch the sun set, from a perspective no one in history ever had before. Mars is now a place to go.

It's all imagination, for the moment. I'm not suggesting anything else. But I'm there, on Mars, just as much as Curiosity is there.

We're all there, now. We've made it.

Another world.


this post has been edited by the author since its original submission

report post as inappropriate

Thomas Howard Ray wrote on Jan. 8, 2013 @ 11:14 GMT
Hi William,

What a beautiful piece. "It's all imagination?" Who's to know when imagination becomes knowledge, except the one whose imagination waits for knowledge to catch up?

All best,


report post as inappropriate

FQXi Administrator Brendan Foster wrote on Feb. 4, 2013 @ 22:10 GMT
Thanks for the piece William. I wonder if this post got a little lost with the holidays, so I am giving it a bump.

report post as inappropriate

Zeeya wrote on Feb. 5, 2013 @ 14:15 GMT
Thanks for the link to your tribute to Ray Bradbury, William. I have to admit, I've only read Fahrenheit 451. I should read more of his work.

report post as inappropriate

Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:

And select the letter between 'K' and 'M':

Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.