Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Contests Home

Current Essay Contest


Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American

Previous Contests

What Is “Fundamental”
October 28, 2017 to January 22, 2018
Sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund and The Peter & Patricia Gruber Foundation
read/discuss

Wandering Towards a Goal
How can mindless mathematical laws give rise to aims and intention?
December 2, 2016 to March 3, 2017
Contest Partner: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Fnd.
read/discusswinners

Trick or Truth: The Mysterious Connection Between Physics and Mathematics
Contest Partners: Nanotronics Imaging, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, and The John Templeton Foundation
Media Partner: Scientific American

read/discusswinners

How Should Humanity Steer the Future?
January 9, 2014 - August 31, 2014
Contest Partners: Jaan Tallinn, The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, The John Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

It From Bit or Bit From It
March 25 - June 28, 2013
Contest Partners: The Gruber Foundation, J. Templeton Foundation, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Questioning the Foundations
Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions Are Wrong?
May 24 - August 31, 2012
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation, SubMeta, and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

Is Reality Digital or Analog?
November 2010 - February 2011
Contest Partners: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation and Scientific American
read/discusswinners

What's Ultimately Possible in Physics?
May - October 2009
Contest Partners: Astrid and Bruce McWilliams
read/discusswinners

The Nature of Time
August - December 2008
read/discusswinners

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Vladimir Rogozhin: on 10/4/12 at 8:41am UTC, wrote Hello, Sergey! Thank you for your valuable explanation! Send it to me even...

Sergey Fedosin: on 10/4/12 at 7:35am UTC, wrote If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings...

Vladimir Rogozhin: on 10/4/12 at 7:29am UTC, wrote Dear Sergey! Thank you very much for your interest and good comments on my...

Sergey Fedosin: on 10/3/12 at 16:21pm UTC, wrote Dear Vladimir, In your essay I found some keys and important physical...

Vladimir Rogozhin: on 10/2/12 at 20:37pm UTC, wrote Dear Vlad! Thank you for your comment and detailed presentation of your...

Vladimir Rogozhin: on 10/2/12 at 18:58pm UTC, wrote Thank you, Sergey! I wrote you a letter in your mailbox. Sincerely,...

Vladimir Rogozhin: on 10/2/12 at 18:53pm UTC, wrote Dear, Yuri! Triunity of absolute states of matter - absolute rest (linear...

Yuri Danoyan: on 10/2/12 at 16:52pm UTC, wrote 12-dimensional ??? Otkuda???


RECENT FORUM POSTS

John Cox: "Zeeya, It is past time for an overhaul to get some protection against..." in The Sudoku Universe, Why...

Zeeya Merali: "Do we live in a giant Sudoku puzzle? Are real numbers really real? Does..." in The Sudoku Universe, Why...

Georgina Woodward: "Joe, your credo has very limited explanatory power and is therefore of very..." in Quantum Dream Time

Joe Fisher: "Dear Georgina, You wrote: “I agree that there have been surfaces prior..." in Quantum Dream Time

shery williams: "Office Setup is the full suite of Microsoft productivity software that..." in Are We Merging With Our...

shery williams: "McAfee offers world-class security solutions for Windows & Mac OS as well..." in Are We Merging With Our...

Yelena Hopper: "Its a decent approach to present a few thoughts in material science yet you..." in We Are All Connected

Yelena Hopper: "There is an existence in the wake of death. Spirits and souls are genuine...." in Wandering Towards a Goal:...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Quantum Dream Time
Defining a ‘quantum clock’ and a 'quantum ruler' could help those attempting to unify physics—and solve the mystery of vanishing time.

Our Place in the Multiverse
Calculating the odds that intelligent observers arise in parallel universes—and working out what they might see.

Sounding the Drums to Listen for Gravity’s Effect on Quantum Phenomena
A bench-top experiment could test the notion that gravity breaks delicate quantum superpositions.

Watching the Observers
Accounting for quantum fuzziness could help us measure space and time—and the cosmos—more accurately.

Bohemian Reality: Searching for a Quantum Connection to Consciousness
Is there are sweet spot where artificial intelligence systems could have the maximum amount of consciousness while retaining powerful quantum properties?


FQXi FORUM
November 25, 2017

CATEGORY: Questioning the Foundations Essay Contest (2012) [back]
TOPIC: Paradigm of the Part Vs. Paradigm of the Whole...The Absolute Generative Structure by Vladimir I. Rogozhin [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Author Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Aug. 7, 2012 @ 11:35 GMT
Essay Abstract

The essential analysis of changing ideas of Space and Time for the period from the beginning of “Archimedes’ Second Revolution” is carried out to overcome the ontological groundlessness of the Knowledge and to expand its borders. Synthetic model of Triune (absolute) 12-dimensional Space and Time is built on the basis of Ontological construction method, Superaxiom and Superprinciple, the nature of Time is determined as a memory of material structure at a certain level of its holistic being.

Author Bio

Engineer, economist, independent researcher for 20 years: ontology, philosophy of physics and mathematics. Member of XX World Congress of Philosophy (Boston, 1998), general manager INTERNETIA Co Ltd: intellectual social networks, the company philosophy, philosophical safety

Download Essay PDF File




Alan Lowey wrote on Aug. 8, 2012 @ 10:21 GMT
Dear Vladimir,

I enjoyed your very informative essay and was pleased to read about the anisotropic views of Descartes for example. An excellent piece of work.

report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Rogozhin replied on Aug. 8, 2012 @ 11:26 GMT
Dear Alan!

Thank you for excellent assessment of my essay!

Best Regards, Vladimir




Benedetti Sara wrote on Aug. 23, 2012 @ 08:32 GMT
Hello, Vladimir! Your "Absolute generating structure", many now do not understand, but this is the deepest sense the limit of thought. This is – get into the point, into the top ten! In this space-time will not be "close" to anyone: reliable spacious "home" with a solid foundation. That's right, the Absolute can not be curved. Time is memory-this corresponds to the age and nature. Success!

report post as inappropriate

Vladimir Rogozhin replied on Aug. 23, 2012 @ 13:26 GMT
Dear Sara,

Thank you for your comment! Indeed, in the era of information revolution foundation of the Universe (the generating Structure) must be acceptable not only for physicists and specialists, develop the theory of information, but also understandable to ordinary citizens of planet Earth, which only began to study physics and informatics.

Best Regards, Vladimir

report post as inappropriate


Hoang cao Hai wrote on Sep. 19, 2012 @ 13:51 GMT
Dear

Very interesting to see your essay.

Perhaps all of us are convinced that: the choice of yourself is right!That of course is reasonable.

So may be we should work together to let's the consider clearly defined for the basis foundations theoretical as the most challenging with intellectual of all of us.

Why we do not try to start with a real challenge is very close and are the focus of interest of the human science: it is a matter of mass and grain Higg boson of the standard model.

Knowledge and belief reasoning of you will to express an opinion on this matter:

You have think that: the Mass is the expression of the impact force to material - so no impact force, we do not feel the Higg boson - similar to the case of no weight outside the Earth's atmosphere.

Does there need to be a particle with mass for everything have volume? If so, then why the mass of everything change when moving from the Earth to the Moon? Higg boson is lighter by the Moon's gravity is weaker than of Earth?

The LHC particle accelerator used to "Smashed" until "Ejected" Higg boson, but why only when the "Smashed" can see it,and when off then not see it ?

Can be "locked" Higg particles? so when "released" if we do not force to it by any the Force, how to know that it is "out" or not?

You are should be boldly to give a definition of weight that you think is right for us to enjoy, or oppose my opinion.

Because in the process of research, the value of "failure" or "success" is the similar with science. The purpose of a correct theory be must is without any a wrong point ?

Glad to see from you comments soon,because still have too many of the same problems.

Regard !

Hải.Caohoàng of THE INCORRECT ASSUMPTIONS AND A CORRECT THEORY

August 23, 2012 - 11:51 GMT on this essay contest.

report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Rogozhin replied on Sep. 22, 2012 @ 17:04 GMT
Dear Hải Caohoàng!

Thank you for your comment. Unfortunately, I had not considered in my essay particles and argued ontological structure of space and the nature of time, the universe as a whole, which is the place of human consciousness and the laws that it captures.

Sincerely, Vladimir



Hoang cao Hai replied on Sep. 23, 2012 @ 18:03 GMT
Dear Vladimir I. Rogozhin

"Absolutely" is my opinion when research for science.

"Fabulous" is my feeling when reading your essay.

Although our methods are different, but really glad to know you also have the same direction as me.

I was named for my theory is the Absolute Theory and will to efforts to it become the final theory of all as your reasoning and the people who have same this opinion.

Kind Regards.

report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Rogozhin replied on Sep. 24, 2012 @ 04:33 GMT
Dear Hải Caohoàng!

«The Trouble With Physics» is a problem of its foundation, which must be absolute, that is unconditional. Whose idea of foundation (the knowledge –physics and mathematics)-ideal structure would be correct? Here the necessary depth ontology to catch "Proteus of Nature" ... It needs a total synthesis of all human knowledge, including the Scriptures, folk tales, legends, wonderful tales and fables...

I would like to know more specifically, you confuse the trinity of absolute states of matter: absolute rest (linear), absolute becoming(wave) and absolute movement(vortex) of matter as the basis of the structure of absolute space?

Best Regards,

Vladimir




Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 2, 2012 @ 10:42 GMT
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1362

report post as inappropriate


Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 2, 2012 @ 10:43 GMT
After studying about 250 essays in this contest, I realize now, how can I assess the level of each submitted work. Accordingly, I rated some essays, including yours.

Cood luck.

Sergey Fedosin

report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Rogozhin replied on Oct. 2, 2012 @ 18:58 GMT
Thank you, Sergey! I wrote you a letter in your mailbox. Sincerely, Vladimir




vlad menbek wrote on Oct. 2, 2012 @ 12:50 GMT
The pulse mechanics

Our installed Is a dense point in the Big Universe (B. В), formed from counter sound (shock) waves in chaotic "matter". In our Universe for accident there is no place, in our Universe for accident there is no time. Only in B. В, in infinity and eternity, there can be such accident, that is, the ordered structure can casually be formed of CHAOS. Our Universe...

view entire post


report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Rogozhin replied on Oct. 2, 2012 @ 20:37 GMT
Dear Vlad!

Thank you for your comment and detailed presentation of your concept. I have to study it in depth, to have a clear answer.

Sincerely, Vladimir




Yuri Danoyan wrote on Oct. 2, 2012 @ 16:52 GMT
12-dimensional ???

Otkuda???

report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Rogozhin replied on Oct. 2, 2012 @ 18:53 GMT
Dear, Yuri!

Triunity of absolute states of matter - absolute rest (linear state) + absolute motion (vortex state) + absolute becoming (wave state) - define the geometry (dimensions) of the triune (absolute) Space: three linear dimension + three vortex + three wave . That is nine dimension of the absolute (unconditioned) Space. Plus three measuring time as the memory material structure by level of her whole being. Model total determinism, the Space-(Matter)-Time of the Logos (the Heavenly Law).

That is, the absolute dimension-12 or the measure-4.

So, according to the ancient principle of "As above, so below," in the macrocosm and the microcosm.

And where is generated by the initial strength and power of the Universe? It is from this initial (absolute, fundamental, generating) structure. The task of physics is not to combine different floors of being, but think about the accuracy of the design and the specifics of each floor being integral world. And the foundation - it is the only one: the absolute generating structure...We need to overcome the linear thinking and the curvature of Space-Space of Logos. Sincerely, Vladimir




Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 3, 2012 @ 16:21 GMT
Dear Vladimir,

In your essay I found some keys and important physical conceptions. I agree that for the first we need in base physical states which have such properties as energy and momentum. The role of vortex of gravitational field up to now was very small in science. But now situation is changed, we see gravitomagnetic experiments already. But the main about this vortex is at the levels of atomic nucleus where is the Gravitational torsion field between nucleons and the spin torsion field counteracts to strong gravitation between nucleons. The other quantity, the wave, is quite important for stationarity of electron state in atom (according to my calculation the flux of kinetic energy in electron substance in form of disk should be equal to fluxes of fields in the substance). Your approach to physics is very metaphysical and need more concrete examples but there is a limitation of essays pages. I rate your essay in good score (in my scale).

Sergey Fedosin

report post as inappropriate


Author Vladimir Rogozhin wrote on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 07:29 GMT
Dear Sergey!

Thank you very much for your interest and good comments on my essay. I read with great interest your deep and insightful essays. You, as an independent researcher thought through anew vertical and horizontal world. Your findings once again confirm that, to overcome "troubles in physics" needs a new conceptual model of the world. Science, including fundamental physics is on the threshold of a new conceptual revolution. Especially important as search a single source, the meeting point of knowledge and faith. Especially interested in your research on the nature of ball lightning. I appreciated your essay their maximum high. Good luck in the contest FQXi! I hope you agree with me, FQXi implementing projects relevant for the world of Science!

Sincerely, Vladimir




Sergey G Fedosin wrote on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 07:35 GMT
If you do not understand why your rating dropped down. As I found ratings in the contest are calculated in the next way. Suppose your rating is
and
was the quantity of people which gave you ratings. Then you have
of points. After it anyone give you
of points so you have
of points and
is the common quantity of the people which gave you ratings. At the same time you will have
of points. From here, if you want to be R2 > R1 there must be:
or
or
In other words if you want to increase rating of anyone you must give him more points
then the participant`s rating
was at the moment you rated him. From here it is seen that in the contest are special rules for ratings. And from here there are misunderstanding of some participants what is happened with their ratings. Moreover since community ratings are hided some participants do not sure how increase ratings of others and gives them maximum 10 points. But in the case the scale from 1 to 10 of points do not work, and some essays are overestimated and some essays are drop down. In my opinion it is a bad problem with this Contest rating process. I hope the FQXI community will change the rating process.

Sergey Fedosin

report post as inappropriate

Author Vladimir Rogozhin replied on Oct. 4, 2012 @ 08:41 GMT
Hello, Sergey!

Thank you for your valuable explanation! Send it to me even to my mail, please.

Granted, the main thing is the new fundamental ideas and their progress! The contest runs for a revolution in basic science! Thank FQXi!

Sincerely, Vladimir




Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.