Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the author are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

paul valletta: on 4/1/08 at 14:07pm UTC, wrote This is the missing link to a new overwiew by Markus

paul valletta: on 4/1/08 at 4:09am UTC, wrote Please forgive marcus should read "Markus".

paul valletta: on 4/1/08 at 4:06am UTC, wrote Actually Marcus Aspelayer has a great collaborated recent paper[/limk]...

paul valletta: on 3/27/08 at 9:10am UTC, wrote So if there are many Universe's, convieniently suppresing the awkward...



FQXi FORUM
May 1, 2017

ARTICLE: Squishy Bedrock [back to article]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

paul valletta wrote on Mar. 27, 2008 @ 09:10 GMT
So if there are many Universe's, convieniently suppresing the awkward questions from certain Universe, like the one I reside within, then I suppose there will be young Universe's where Einstein never existed, so the whole of GR is meaninless, and of course some Universes where Quantum Mechanics do not exist! So one can really make up any laws whatsoever, how about the "new" number theory based not on 10, but on the number six, just happens to be the numbers that convieniently fit onto the geometric shaped dice, any number above six is a 4 number variable!

The Q-RAY Process ?

There is a recent paper

Seth Lloyd

in which there are interesting handwaving, or quantum_ranging process, or Q-RAYS ?

Take the Quantum Light that Seth propose's, now using an entangled photon, one can send it into a box containing shoedingers cat. Then, according to Seth's paper, one can take a "quantum_image" of the cat, thereby confirming its existence, either alive or dead, without the cat or detector actually knowing it is being investigated.

The H.U.P gets violated by fact the Q-Rays confirms not only existence, but non-existence, which make location and momentum 100% factual?

Perhaps the Parrallel Universe is inside/outside the mind of a creator/observer , and thew interaction of existence is paramount and fundemental to all?

Do we need other Universe's with their other Laws? are ther many Universe's with a single Law, or just one Universe with multiple Laws?

report post as inappropriate


paul valletta wrote on Apr. 1, 2008 @ 04:06 GMT
Actually Marcus Aspelayer has a great collaborated recent

paper[/limk] and it really does reveal fascinating Quantum measure avenue's.

report post as inappropriate


paul valletta wrote on Apr. 1, 2008 @ 04:09 GMT
Please forgive marcus should read "Markus".

report post as inappropriate


paul valletta wrote on Apr. 1, 2008 @ 14:07 GMT
This is the missing link to a new overwiew by

Markus

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:
Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.