Search FQXi


If you are aware of an interesting new academic paper (that has been published in a peer-reviewed journal or has appeared on the arXiv), a conference talk (at an official professional scientific meeting), an external blog post (by a professional scientist) or a news item (in the mainstream news media), which you think might make an interesting topic for an FQXi blog post, then please contact us at forums@fqxi.org with a link to the original source and a sentence about why you think that the work is worthy of discussion. Please note that we receive many such suggestions and while we endeavour to respond to them, we may not be able to reply to all suggestions.

Please also note that we do not accept unsolicited posts and we cannot review, or open new threads for, unsolicited articles or papers. Requests to review or post such materials will not be answered. If you have your own novel physics theory or model, which you would like to post for further discussion among then FQXi community, then please add them directly to the "Alternative Models of Reality" thread, or to the "Alternative Models of Cosmology" thread. Thank you.

Forum Home
Introduction
Terms of Use

Order posts by:
 chronological order
 most recent first

Posts by the blogger are highlighted in orange; posts by FQXi Members are highlighted in blue.

By using the FQXi Forum, you acknowledge reading and agree to abide by the Terms of Use

 RSS feed | RSS help
RECENT POSTS IN THIS TOPIC

Wilhelmus Wilde: on 6/25/12 at 16:11pm UTC, wrote In the reductionist way of thinking we meet all kind of problems when...

Zeeya Merali: on 6/25/12 at 15:43pm UTC, wrote A short post to highlight a discussion around one of our recent podcasts....


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Thomas Ray: "Amen to that." in Science Funding in an...

John Cox: "Science funding needs to start at the preschool level. That was probably..." in Science Funding in an...

jim hughes: "Georgina, I'll have to think about how to best answer that question. But ..." in Defining Existence

Georgina Woodward: "Hi Jim, 'Where are the atoms?' was posed as a question for you to..." in Defining Existence

dieu le: "Einstein’s theory of Gravity has no place for Gravitational Waves One..." in Alternative Models of...

Pentcho Valev: "Entropy Is Not a State Function (Thermodynamics Is Not Even Wrong) ..." in Dirty Secrets of...Life:...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Untangling Quantum Causation
Figuring out if A causes B should help to write the rulebook for quantum physics.

In Search of a Quantum Spacetime
Finding the universe's wavefunction could be the key to understanding the emergence of reality.

Collapsing Physics: Q&A with Catalina Oana Curceanu
Tests of a rival to quantum theory, taking place in the belly of the Gran Sasso d'Italia mountain, could reveal how the fuzzy subatomic realm of possibilities comes into sharp macroscopic focus.

Dropping Schrödinger's Cat Into a Black Hole
Combining gravity with the process that transforms the fuzzy uncertainty of the quantum realm into the definite classical world we see around us could lead to a theory of quantum gravity.

Does Quantum Weirdness Arise When Parallel Classical Worlds Repel?
Quantum mechanics could derive from subtle interactions among unseen neighboring universes


FQXi BLOGS
September 27, 2016

CATEGORY: Blog [back]
TOPIC: A Table-Top Test for Quantum Gravity [refresh]
Bookmark and Share
Login or create account to post reply or comment.

FQXi Administrator Zeeya Merali wrote on Jun. 25, 2012 @ 15:43 GMT
A short post to highlight a discussion around one of our recent podcasts. In the April edition of the podcast, I chatted with FQXi’s Markus Aspelmeyer about a proposal for a table-top test for quantum gravity that he and his colleagues had outlined in Nature Physics. The idea is to look for modifications to Heisenberg’s Uncertainty principle due to quantum gravity models, using microscale mirrors in the lab.

During the podcast, we mentioned that Sabine Hossenfelder was quite sceptical about this -- she blogged her concerns that the team failed to address the question of Lorentz-invariance here.

Now one of the paper’s co-authors, Caslav Brukner, has written a response, so I’m inviting you to head over to the podcast thread (and over to Sabine’s Backreaction blog where the same comment has been posted) to discuss that.

report post as inappropriate


Wilhelmus de Wilde wrote on Jun. 25, 2012 @ 16:11 GMT
In the reductionist way of thinking we meet all kind of problems when reaching the Planck scale. Try the "emergence" way, and a lot of things become easier to understand but also to explain.

Wilhelmus

report post as inappropriate


Login or create account to post reply or comment.

Please enter your e-mail address:

And select the letter between 'F' and 'H':


Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.