Search FQXi


RECENT FORUM POSTS

Robert McEachern: "Tom, Your essay concludes with: "If reality is objective and not..." in Quantum Coherence =...

Zeeya Merali: "This month’s podcast is jam-packed, thanks to all the huge physics..." in New Podcast: Pluto,...

Thomas Ray: "It's verifiable, although not falsifiable. This is the point of my essay..." in Quantum Coherence =...

John Cox: "Gary, You are correct. More then that, the much publicized hype about the..." in Inferring the Limits on...

Georgina Woodward: "Dear Eckard, thank you for your comments. I don't see it as an attack on..." in Alternative Models of...

Eckard Blumschein: "Dear Georgina, Should RCIP RIP? I feel guilty because RCIP mentioned me,..." in Alternative Models of...

Gary Simpson: "I'm thinking that the time line might contradict your hypothesis. SR dates..." in Inferring the Limits on...

Zeeya Merali: "Dear Steve, I have just read your post, and I wanted to say that I am..." in In Praise of Physics...


RECENT ARTICLES
click titles to read articles

Conjuring a Neutron Star from a Nanowire
Using tiny mechanical devices to create accelerations equivalent to 100 million times the Earth’s gravitational field—mimicking the arena of quantum gravity in the lab.

Inferring the Limits on Reality (that Even the Gods Must Obey)
The fuzziness of the quantum realm could arise from mathematical restrictions on what can ever be known.

The Quantum Thermodynamic Revolution
Combining theories of quantum information with the science of heat and energy transfer could lead to new technologies.

Face Off: Building a Toy Universe to Pit Quantum Theory Against Gravity
Using superconducting circuits to create a curved-spacetime analog with stronger gravity than our cosmos.

Is Gravity Time's Archer?
A new model argues the forces between particles in the early universe loosed time's arrow, creating temporal order from chaos.


FQXI ARTICLE
July 29, 2015

Bookmark and Share

Comment on this Article

Please read the important Introduction that governs your participation in this community. Inappropriate language will not be tolerated and posts containing such language will be deleted. Otherwise, this is a free speech Forum and all are welcome!
  • Please enter the text of your post, then click the "Submit New Post" button below. You may also optionally add file attachments below before submitting your edits.

  • HTML tags are not permitted in posts, and will automatically be stripped out. Links to other web sites are permitted. For instructions on how to add links, please read the link help page.

  • You may use superscript (10100) and subscript (A2) using [sup]...[/sup] and [sub]...[/sub] tags.

  • You may use bold (important) and italics (emphasize) using [b]...[/b] and [i]...[/i] tags.

  • You may also include LateX equations into your post.

Insert LaTeX Equation [hide]

LaTeX equations may be displayed in FQXi Forum posts by including them within [equation]...[/equation] tags. You may type your equation directly into your post, or use the LaTeX Equation Preview feature below to see how your equation will render (this is recommended).

For more help on LaTeX, please see the LaTeX Project Home Page.

LaTeX Equation Preview



preview equation
clear equation
insert equation into post at cursor


Your name: (optional)



Important: In order to combat spam, please select the letter in this menu between 'V' and 'X':




Recent Comments


The quantum Darwinism is a consequence from the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. For instance, there are no superposition problem in the Bohmian mechanics and any transition of quantum to classical. Simply, if the mass of a particle is high enough that the quantum potential is negligible, the particle is described by the classical mechanics. It is nice that the coming year 2009 is dedicated to Darwin, which will certainly accelerate the discussions on the quantum Darwinism as...


basic frequency of quanta of space is a driving force of the evolution, space plays an active role into evolution of life that is an cosmic phenomena, life develops into entire universe


It may come as a surprise to many to see a proposed fundamental physical theory that employs a Darwinian process at its core. Isn't Darwinism biological? What is it doing in physics?

Lee Smolin also has a cosmological theory based on a Darwinian process: Cosmological Natural Selection.

Of course Natural Selection is the central organizing principal of Biology but there are also other Biological quasi-independent theories such as the Bayesian Brain that explain much of neurobiology...

read all article comments

Please enter your e-mail address:

And select the letter between 'H' and 'J':


Note: Joining the FQXi mailing list does not give you a login account or constitute membership in the organization.