The Patchwork Multiverse
Cutting spacetime into patches could help explain the size of the universe—and provide the first ”experimental” evidence that string theory is on the right track.
December 2, 2010
One man’s abstract is another man’s concrete. Nearly all ordinary folk, and even some physicists, would consider string theory to be a highly theoretical enterprise. But to Raphael Bousso
, strings are intimately tied to understanding the universe we see around us. "The motivation is to understand how Nature works, and what’s going on out there," he says.
Which is just as well, for Bousso is trying to solve one of the biggest puzzles in the cosmos: Just why is the universe so large? Bousso’s quest has led him to consider a multitude of universes and, in particular, how the value of the cosmological constant—the intrinsic energy of the vacuum of spacetime—could vary across different universe patches. The answer, Bousso claims, is "the first example of an experimental success of string theory."
It makes sense to look for a connection between the cosmological constant and the size of the universe. Many physicists believe that vacuum energy is the mysterious "dark energy
" that is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate. To fit with the cosmos that we see around us, the value of the constant should be small. The trouble is that this is in violent disagreement with calculations of vacuum energy from quantum field theory, by some 120 orders of magnitude.
In 1997, Steven Weinberg, of the University of Texas, Austin, came up with the first realistic prediction for the value of the cosmological constant. Weinberg noted that there comes a time in the evolution of the universe when the cosmological constant—which repulses gravity and causes spacetime to expand faster and faster—becomes dominant. He realized that if the constant was much larger than 10-120
, it would dominate the universe too early, before galaxies, and in turn life, could be formed.
This allowed Weinberg to ask the question: What’s the most likely value of the cosmological constant that would be seen by observers in our universe? The answer: 10-120
. Weinberg’s prediction was borne out by experiments to within a few orders of magnitude. "But the thing that was missing from the whole story was the theoretical underpinning," says Bousso.
As Weinberg himself noted, his arguments made sense only if there were many, many patches of spacetime, each with its own randomly-determined value of the cosmological constant. But in 1997, there wasn’t a theory that could generate different patches of spacetime, each with a different vacuum.
This is the first example
of an experimental
success of string theory.
- Raphael Bousso
This is where string theory comes in. Over the past decade, Bousso along with Joe Polchinksi
of the University of California, Santa Barbara, and others, has shown that string theory predicts the existence of more than 10500
vacua of spacetime. Essentially, each vacuum represents a different universe, each with different values for the cosmological constant and with different particles and forces.
The physical realization of this ensemble is referred to as the multiverse
. With this theoretical underpinning in place, Bousso and Polchinski asked the same question that Weinberg did: What would be the most likely value of the cosmological constant that would be seen by an observer? They were able to show that the landscape would have regions with a cosmological constant that tallied well with observations.
But soon it became clear that the analysis suffered from a profound problem: How do you calculate the number of observers in a seemingly infinite universe?
Bousso’s answer was to limit himself to thinking only about an imaginary observer who lives forever. Because of the finite speed of light, this observer can only see events within a certain region of their universe—their causal patch
. Bousso has calculated that the size of the causal patch doesn’t change much over the lifetime of the long-lived observer. But inside this causal patch, the cosmological constant has a tremendous effect. As soon as it becomes dominant, it starts to accelerate the expansion of spacetime, and very soon dilutes the matter inside the causal patch.
"If the cosmological constant starts becoming important before the observers form, then there just won’t be very many observers opening their eyes in the region where you are allowed to count them," says Bousso.
Using the causal patch technique, Bousso found that the cosmological constant is related to the time at which observers inhabit any given universe. Plugging the age of our universe into his equations gave Bousso a universe that would be about 1061.5 Planck lengths
across and would have a cosmological constant of 10-123
—both of which agree with observations. In fact, the value of the cosmological constant obtained in this manner is more precise than the one calculated by Weinberg.
Is Evidence of Dark Energy Also Evidence of the Multiverse?
The distribution of galaxies in a universe without dark
energy (left) would differ from one in which
dark energy is significant (right).
Credit: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
But is there a fundamental constraint on when observers appear? Yes, says Bousso. And it has to do with the size of the landscape of string theory. It turns out that despite the extraordinarily large number of vacua in the string landscape, not all of them are cosmologically-viable, in the sense of giving rise to an expanding universe and hosting observers. And in most vacua in which the formation of observers is not hindered by the cosmological constant, observers form as late as possible in the evolution of the universe. In such a scenario, Bousso’s calculations show that the smallest possible value of the cosmological constant is given by the inverse of the number of viable vacua.
So, the origin of these numbers—why the cosmological constant is not smaller and why the universe is not bigger—has to do with the finiteness of the string landscape, explains Bousso.
"It actually explains the cosmological constant in a way that previous theoretical attempts have utterly failed," he says.
The challenge going forward is to get a better handle on the string landscape. For instance, in their latest paper, which was work done using an FQXi grant of over $60,000
, Bousso and colleagues predict that the string landscape will have about 10123
so-called meta-stable vacua that could give rise to habitable universes in which observers could form (arXiv:1011.0714v2
This explains the cosmological
constant in a way that
previous attempts have
- Raphael Bousso
Roni Harnik of Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois, thinks the success is due to Bousso’s approach to such problems: "The attitude of many people towards the landscape is ’even if it’s true, I won’t think about it because we’ll never make progress.’ Raphael is willing to think about everything, which is why he makes surprising discoveries."
Bousso has been successful in taking nebulous questions and coming up with something concrete, says Polchinski. "His conclusion is something that can eventually be refined into a sharp mathematical prediction."
Sharp predictions are exactly what string theory needs, to counter criticisms that the theory is too far removed from reality. But Bousso has long been convinced that he is on the right track. "I think the evidence is mounting that there really is a multiverse and that there all these vacua there," he says. "I don’t think we can claim victory yet, but there is really no other game in town."
Please read the important Introduction that governs your
participation in this community. Inappropriate language will not be tolerated and posts containing such language will be deleted. Otherwise, this is a free speech Forum and all are welcome!
ANONYMOUS wrote on November 9, 2013
Baggott[Farewell to Reality: How Fairy-Tale Physics Has Betrayed The Search For Scientific Truth] and even more spot-on Unzicker-Jones[Bankrupting Physics: How Top Scientists Are Gambling Away Their Credibility] critiques shame physics’ shameless rock-star media-hype P.R. spin-doctoring veracity-abandoning touting sci-fi “show-biz” trending viral exacerbated by online social networks veritable diarrhea via proliferation of uncritical “pop-sci” science-writers where all is spectacle...
JOE BLOGS wrote on August 11, 2011
Please reply to my post Moldinows book Page 160.
"this is because according to the laws of gravity it is only in three dimensions that stable eliptical orbits are possible.Circular orbits are possible in other dimensions but those as Newton feared are unstable I any but three dimesions even a small disturbance.
I invite phsyics teachers to comment on my thoery of everthing for time.
And time is only one variable of the thoery..............
You can include space as...
JOE BLOGS wrote on August 11, 2011
read all article comments
Conver a 12 dimensional circular space time orbit into 3 dimensions plus one of time.
WIth the formula 360/60= 6 minutes/year difference from sidereal time.
Convert E=MC^2 for an eliptical orbit of earth where C^2 is the space time interval.
To a circular orbit in 12 dimensions including two of time.
Man seeks to control what he does not understand if time is understood maybe he can control it.
But I doubt it 12 is right for time according to Jesus so 12...